
M. Night Shyamalan Breaks Wind: “The Happening”
June 18, 2008
Oh wow. Having watched The Happening, I can safely say that once the Wachowski brothers come to in pools of their own filth, they are going to feel so much better about Speed Racer. Yes, the movie is that bad. Yes, the summer season is that bad. It’s not even the 4th of July yet and already we have two formidable competitors for “best bad film of 2008.” The only way this season could possibly get better is if we got a sequel to The Wicker Man (oh please…please…).
Okay, there are going to be major spoilers here in a minute, so if you’re sensitive to that sort of thing, why don’t you just hang out here a while?
So…The Happening. Okay, basically it begins with a lovely day in Central Park. The birds are singing. The grass is green. People are offing themselves…what? Yeah, everyone freezes up for a moment, then they just start killing themselves. Damndest thing.
Cut to Philadelphia where Elliot Moore (Mark Whalberg, who may or may not have been awake during the filming of this movie) is teaching what must be the easiest high school science class in the Universe.
After he tries to solicit theories from his class as to why the honeybees are disappearing he concludes with “We’ll never really know.” Uh, thanks scientist man. Elliot’s been having a rough go of it lately. His wife Alma (Zooey Deschanel, looking more like Elliot’s disaffected little sister than his wife) is struggling with her guilt over a recent matrimonial betrayal. Did she have an affair? No, she had dessert with a co-worker. Seriously, that’s the marital rift that must be mended by the end of the movie. It also provides one of the movie’s best lines when Alma takes a phone call from her dessert-buddy and snaps “It was just tiramisu! Stop acting crazy!” Oh tiramisu, that most forbidden of the lusty Italian desserts! Anyway, there is much tension in the marriage. Elliot’s best friend and co-worker Julian (John Leguizamo) has decided that Alma is the spawn of the devil and that Elliot should just ditch her. Julian is kind of a prick.
Oh yeah, people are killing themselves aren’t they? Soon, word of the mass-suicides in New York reaches the school and naturally everyone thinks it’s a terrorist attack (yes, they think it’s a terrorist attack that makes people kill themselves). So everyone decides to flee Philadelphia (not really clear on the logic behind that) and Elliot and Alma join Julian and his grade-school-aged daughter Jess on an Amtrak out of Dodge. Unfortunately, their travel plans get derailed (no pun intended) when the train stops in a small Pennsylvania town and refuses to go any further. “We’ve lost contact,” the conductor explains. “With who?” Elliot asks. “Everyone” the conductor replies solemnly. Apparently Amtrak has a whole mission control system it stays in constant communication with or something.
From here the group must make their across the perilous countryside as more and more reports of suicides come in. Pretty soon Elliot deduces that the suicides are being caused by…the trees! Well, actually a chemical that plant life is emitting that’s being carried on a wind they’re (I guess) causing. He comes to this conclusion in what must be the movie’s most unintentionally hilarious scene: While Alma freaks out, Elliot has a frantic monologue thinking out loud standing in a field as people around him are taking turns shooting themselves in the head:
“All right, be scientific, douchebag.”
BLAM!
“Identify the… rules… design the experiment… “
BLAM!
“…careful observation, measurements, that’s what I’m trying to do…”
BLAM!
“…interpret the pattern…”
BLAM!
And it goes this way until Elliot comes up with a plan of action: “Just try and stay ahead of the wind!” (uh, what?) Fortunately, the wind has a leading edge to it—literally a line, like a wall of air—so they (and we the audience) can always tell when the wind is catching up to them. Just for good measure Shyamalan throws in a “wishhshhhshhooo” wind-noise sound effect to make it, um, I guess creepier is what he was going for.
And the evil tree/wind gradually winnows down the cast until it’s just Elliot, Alma and Jess. They hole up in a decrepit farm house (because wind, like the aliens in Signs can’t get through closed doors and shuttered windows) inhabited by some batshit-crazy old woman (Betty Buckley) who stomps around and accuses Elliot of wanting to rob her. Then the evil tree/wind gets her and she smashes her head through all the house’s windows. And then it pretty much just stops. No, it’s not really much of a climax.
The Happening gives further credence to the charge against Shyamalan that he’s a good director but a bad writer. What’s truly remarkable is how thoroughly Shyamalan plays to his weaknesses here. The Happening’s hook—people inexplicably stop and commit suicide—is great, but the story is ridiculous. It reads like a Twilight Zone episode Serling would have penned late in the season when he’d already cranked out 20 other episodes and had lost a third of his body weight from chain-smoking. Even at 85 or so tight minutes, the movie can’t keep its internal logic from disintegrating or the audience from realizing that wind isn’t, you know, all that scary. On top of this, the suicides grow more and more ludicrous culminating in the already-iconic bad scene in which a zookeeper lets a couple of tigers rip off his arms (zookeeper extends some very fake-looking arms which sorta fall off when the tigers paw at them).
In keeping the story tightly contained to a couple of characters, he further emphasizes his inability to create realistic characters and dialogue. Never for a moment does Elliot or Alma seem like remotely plausible. The trumped-up rocky patch in their marriage is laughable—I mean, tiramisu, for chrissakes! And the happy ending in which Elliot and Alma have now adopted Jess and Alma is pregnant and they moved into a great brownstone (he reigns it in before they can win the lottery and get elected Pope and Popestress) just makes you wonder what these people will be saying to each other on their next anniversary: “Isn’t it great there was that environmental tragedy in which hundreds of thousands of people died, so we could work through our dessert-related problems and rediscover our love for each other? Oh, and our friend died, so we got this awesome ready-made daughter out of it?”
Furthermore, by making the evil tree/wind the villain in the movie he forces himself to stage increasingly idiotic scenes of people running and hiding from…wind! I defy any director to make running away from wind scary, thrilling, or even logical.
Shyamalan is a talented director, but like the Wachowski brothers and George Lucas he’s developed an acute myopia to where his talents begin and end. Weirdly enough, he doesn’t even seem able to look back on his previous work and identify what worked and what didn’t. He just seems to be off in Shyamalan-land where narfs and scrunts play and the wind makes you want to kill yourself and couples exchange fourth-grade-reading-level dialogue about the evils of tiramisu.
So, as your faithful mine-shaft canary, let me end by saying if someone tries to convince you to see The Happening…run. Run like the wind (is chasing you)!
I agree this movie was horrible. It had a great premise of how we are affecting the environment and how it could eventually kill us all. This was a very poor version of that story!
http://green4u.wordpress.com
Not to mention that in trying to have a pro-environmental message, it inadvertantly makes the case that we’d be better off paving over every blade of grass in existence.
Have you read the claims that the movie is pushing a “Christian” viewpoint?
http://io9.com/5016361/the-happening-is-the-biggest-intelligent-design-movie-of-the-year
Seems kind of far-fetched to me. I mean, it hardly sounds intelligent enough to merit having any kind of philosophy attributed to it–not even something as half-baked as intelligent design.
There is no intelligence–design or otherwise–contained in this movie.
You know, I’m glad you wrote this review. Because otherwise, I might have considered seeing it because of that moment in the trailer when the Amtrak guy says, “We’ve lost contact,” and Marky Mark asks petulantly, “With whom?”.
It is a great get-drunk-and-make-fun-of-it movie.
Hey ~
Thank you for taking the bullet for us! I could tell from the movie trailer that I had no interest in seeing The Happening. The purpose of a trailer is to make you want to see the film, right? Can I just say, The Happening is the most genric “I can’t think of anything” title ever?! hahaha….
XO ~
Kandye
If I’ve saved one person from “The Happening,” then it’s all worthwhile. Thanks for the kudos. (And it’s nice to see that someone out there likes Shannyn Sossamon).
Hi GM ~
When I first read that you knew I like Shannyn Sossamon, I had a shiver go down my spine thinking you were a mind-reader. Then, I remembered doing a post about her on my blog this morn. Way more boring than you being able to read my thoughts through the computer, huh?
;> Kandye
PS….. I just realized I left an e outta generic in my last comment. *hanging my head in shame*
Yeah, I’m no mind-reader. I also never got a chance to see “Moonlight,” since it didn’t air over here. and it’s nice that someone appreciated Sossamon. I thought she was great in “Wristcutters,” yet all my gal-pals bare their claws when I bring her up (”Wristcutters,” “Catacombs,” “One Missed Call” )
I saw this movie. I suspected it was going to be bad. But I was on a date and, well, I figured if the film was less than engrossing, I could make out with my friend in the back of the theater.
I did think that the first shots of the wind were successfully sinister, but then it got comical upon repetition. The crazy old lady was highly effective as crazy. But the message was heavy handed and the relationships b/w the characters were unconvincing. Marky Mark’s “lesson” was ridiculous and he would have gotten a serious reprimand for treating the vice principal like that in front of the students.
One good thing about this movie is that Shannyn Sossamon was not in it.
Wow. The Shannyn hate runs broad and deep.
Oh… thank you for this review. I was ALMOST tricked by Shyamalan (or I should say, the studio’s advertising agency) once again. Even though I say “NEVER AGAIN” every time I see one of his movies, the ads suck me in each time. But not this time. HA! I laugh at you, fate! Ha!
Oh, my, god…. I couldn’t even finish your review lol. OK, you are either not very smart or incredibly american
Now, excuse me if I speak to you as if you were a child but… apparently this is what you need! Buddy, you missed the whole bloody point. you think you can do better, go film a movie. M.Night was making a point. YOU, ME, and everyone else is a parasite. We are cancer to this earth. Keep going and earth will find a way to fight back. Sad thing is that you cannot get passed the idea of hollywood. Use your imagination man, don’t bloody quote the movie for me, I’ve watched it thanks. Try to analyze the meaning of it, not the acting… sheesh… It’s like a horde of cows watching this movie. You’d think you have never read a book in your life. If you had understood the movie, you would have felt how terrifying its concept really is, and how possible. Shyamalan is brilliant. But if you are not smart enough to even begin to understand his point, do not waste ppl’s time by pretending to know anything about what he was communicating. PLEASE, open your eyes and understand that more tahn just a budget and gory effects, Shyamalan was putting forth and IDEA.
You’re being facetious, right? Are you M. Night Shyamalan’s mom?
lol, his mom? no. Maybe I was a bit agressive, but it seems that whoever wrote this review really missed everything. The comments are rather pointless. And they remind me of a lot of what I read about the Village, which I thought also had a great concept. People got mad because the ‘monsters’ turned out to be villagers getting ready for holloween. But isn’t that much scarier than a real freak of nature running around trying to kill ppl? The IDEA behind taht movie was how religion can be (and is) used to control ppl. You mix the paranormal with God and TADA! you got yourself a flock of sheep. But it seems nobody saw that… And same here, the guy complains about the short lines or ppl’s big, blue eyes. But I thought the concept was brilliant. It’s true taht he could have explained a lot more about why/how etc. but then the movie would have been butchered because of its length. And yes, there were many things that lacked, but that’s all he concentrated on. To make a point, ANY point, you have to show both sides of the coin
and who starts a review with “oh wow”… lol
Look, the IDEA or CONCEPT behind a movie can be great, but when you’re reviewing a film you’re doing just that: reviewing the FILM. That is, the final product and everything that comprises it–writing, acting, set design, soundtrack, the works. Giving a bad movie a pass because the idea behind it was good is like praising an inedible dinner because one of the ingredients was fresh.
Furthermore, when you’re the sole creative force behind a movie, as Shyamalan is with his, the credit or blame pretty much falls squarely on your shoulders.
On top of that, I’m not impressed with the concept of “The Happening.” The idea that “nature strikes back,” is not new or novel. They were making ecological revenge movies back in the early ’70s (”Frogs,” “Phase IV,” etc.) The premise that people are unexpectedly killing themselves is full of creepy potential, but Shyamalan fumbled it. I’ll give him credit for an irresistible hook, but that’s it.
Maybe too many people are satisfied with badly executed, unoriginal ideas. It would explain a lot that is wrong not only with Hollywood, but also with society in general.
As for the tone and style of your reviews, I didn’t realize that personal blogs had to follow The BBC News Style Guide or The Chicago Manual of Style. Silly me, I didn’t know personal blogs were constricted by the standardized rules of writing we all learned back in secondary school. That sucks–now you’ll have to go back and re-write all your reviews so that they sound like university entrance essays.